Illustrative sample review

Trace every finding from source to test.

A fictional CT-to-archive review showing the evidence boundary, exact citations, open actions, acceptance checks, and decision readout.

Downloadable work product

Inspect the working files.

The workbook contains the full evidence matrix, gap register, test scenarios, source register, and formula-driven readout. The PDFs provide a concise readout and the cited synthetic excerpts.

01 · Review brief

The decision and evidence boundary.

Illustrative · Synthetic
Decision

Can the project approve a controlled acceptance-test scope for the planned CT-to-archive workflow using the documentation currently available?

Systems in scope

Harbor CT 4.2, Orion Archive 7.1, and Northstar Viewer 3.6.

Workflow

Store a new synthetic CT study, make it available to the viewer, and query an existing prior under the correct patient context.

Evidence boundary

Three fictional source documents and a synthetic workflow brief. PHI, credentials, endpoints, logs, production access, and real product claims are excluded.

02 · Cited comparison

Capability claims kept separate from conclusions.

Every row points to exact fictional document, version, page, and section excerpts below.

SupportedDocumented on both sides

ConditionalDepends on a stated prerequisite

UnsupportedA required capability is absent

ConflictingSources disagree

UnknownThe reviewed evidence does not establish it

IDRequirement

Documented evidence

Counterpart evidence

Evidence statusCheckSources
ST-01CT image storage

Harbor CT 4.2 documents CT Image Storage as SCU.

Orion Archive 7.1 documents CT Image Storage as SCP.

SupportedIP-AT-01HCT-4.1.1OAR-5.2.2
TS-02Required transfer syntax

Explicit VR Little Endian is documented for CT storage.

Explicit VR Little Endian is documented for CT storage.

SupportedIP-AT-01HCT-4.1.1OAR-5.2.2
SEC-03Secure transport profile

TLS is site-configurable; the profile and certificate owner are not named.

TLS is optional; the profile and certificate assumptions are not stated.

ConditionalIP-AT-02HCT-8.2OAR-9.4
QR-04Study-level prior query

Northstar Viewer 3.6 documents Study Root C-FIND as SCU.

Orion Archive 7.1 documents Study Root C-FIND as SCP for configured viewer AEs.

ConditionalIP-AT-03NSV-3.2OAR-10.3
ID-05Patient-context correction

The reviewed Harbor CT and Northstar Viewer sections do not describe correction behavior.

The reviewed Orion Archive sections do not describe merge or reconciliation behavior.

UnknownIP-DISC-04HCT-1.3NSV-1.4OAR-2.1

03 · Gap and action register

Evidence state and follow-up state stay separate.

A finding can remain conditional or unknown even while the action to resolve it moves from open to resolved.

G-01 · SEC-03Conditional

Confirm the approved TLS profile, certificate ownership, and environment prerequisites.

Workflow consequence
Secure transport cannot be configured or accepted.
Recommended owner
Vendor implementation leads
Needed by
Before interface configuration
Action status
Open
G-02 · ID-05Unknown

Define the required patient-context correction behavior and confirm each product's role.

Workflow consequence
The correction workflow has no agreed pass or fail condition.
Recommended owner
Imaging IT and vendors
Needed by
Before acceptance testing
Action status
Open
G-03 · QR-04Conditional

Confirm that the viewer AE is included in the archive query scope.

Workflow consequence
Prior studies may not be discoverable from the viewer.
Recommended owner
Archive administrator
Needed by
Before prior-query testing
Action status
Open

04 · Acceptance and discovery scenarios

Observable outcomes instead of “test connectivity.”

Acceptance checks have pass/fail outcomes. Discovery checks record behavior so an unresolved requirement can be defined; they are not acceptance tests.

IP-AT-01

Store a new synthetic CT study

AcceptanceST-01TS-02
Prerequisite

A synthetic CT study with agreed identifiers is available. Storage endpoints and transfer syntax are configured.

Action

Send the study over the approved test association, then open it from the archive worklist.

Expected outcome

The complete study is stored once. Patient and study identifiers match. Every instance uses the agreed transfer syntax.

Evidence to capture

Association log, archive receipt record, instance count, identifier comparison

Recommended owner

Imaging integration lead

Recorded state

Test: Not run

Actual: Not recorded

Action: Open

IP-AT-02

Prove the approved secure transport path

AcceptanceSEC-03
Prerequisite

The project has approved the TLS profile and configured test certificates.

Action

Send the storage workflow over the approved secure association, then repeat with an invalid trust condition.

Expected outcome

The approved path succeeds. The invalid trust condition fails without accepting image data.

Evidence to capture

TLS negotiation evidence, success log, rejected-connection log

Recommended owner

Security and interface leads

Recorded state

Test: Not run

Actual: Not recorded

Action: Blocked

IP-AT-03

Query and open a prior study

AcceptanceQR-04
Prerequisite

A synthetic prior exists under the agreed patient context. The viewer AE is in the archive query scope.

Action

Query from the viewer and open the returned prior study.

Expected outcome

The expected study is returned once and opens with the intended patient and study context.

Evidence to capture

Query request and response, returned identifiers, viewer screenshot

Recommended owner

Viewer and archive leads

Recorded state

Test: Not run

Actual: Not recorded

Action: Blocked

IP-DISC-04

Observe patient-context correction behavior

DiscoveryID-05
Prerequisite

The project has defined a synthetic correction case, but the required product behavior is not yet agreed.

Action

Run the proposed correction workflow and record behavior in the archive and viewer.

Expected outcome

No pass or fail result is assigned. Observed behavior is captured so the project can define an acceptance criterion with the responsible owners.

Evidence to capture

Before and after identifiers, audit records, archive behavior, viewer behavior

Recommended owner

Imaging IT and vendors

Recorded state

Test: Not run

Actual: Not recorded

Action: Open

05 · Executive readout

Controlled testing is supportable. Acceptance is not.

The documented CT storage path is supportable enough to begin controlled testing after the named prerequisites are resolved. Secure transport and prior-query scope remain conditional. Patient-context correction still lacks an agreed requirement and acceptance criterion.

Supported2

Documented on both sides

Conditional2

Needs prerequisite proof

Unsupported0

No sample findings

Conflicting0

No sample findings

Unknown1

Evidence does not establish it

Next decision

Resolve the TLS profile and viewer query scope, then run the three acceptance checks. Use the discovery check to record correction behavior and define acceptance criteria before that workflow is approved.

Format, not a finding

This sample does not record executed tests, certify interoperability, support final acceptance, or describe any real product. Real reviews are tailored to the project's approved scope and evidence boundary.

06 · Synthetic source register

Exact excerpts behind the matrix.

All document names, versions, publication dates, pages, sections, and excerpts are fictional.

HCT-1.3

Harbor CT DICOM Conformance Statement · Version 4.2 · Published July 15, 2026

Page 4 · Section 1.3 Scope

This statement describes storage, worklist, and query support. Patient merge and correction workflows are outside the scope of this document.

Does not establish patient-context correction behavior.

HCT-4.1.1

Harbor CT DICOM Conformance Statement · Version 4.2 · Published July 15, 2026

Page 24 · Section 4.1.1 Image Storage

The Harbor CT Application Entity initiates C-STORE for CT Image Storage using Explicit VR Little Endian when negotiated with the destination SCP.

Supports CT storage and transfer-syntax findings.

HCT-8.2

Harbor CT DICOM Conformance Statement · Version 4.2 · Published July 15, 2026

Page 42 · Section 8.2 Transport Security

TLS can be enabled for configured destinations. The selected TLS profile and certificate-authority ownership are site configuration decisions.

Makes secure transport conditional on project confirmation.

OAR-2.1

Orion Archive Integration Guide · Version 7.1 · Published June 28, 2026

Page 8 · Section 2.1 Document Coverage

This guide covers storage, query, retrieval, security, and deployment configuration. Patient merge and reconciliation behavior is not specified.

Does not establish patient-context correction behavior.

OAR-5.2.2

Orion Archive Integration Guide · Version 7.1 · Published June 28, 2026

Page 31 · Section 5.2.2 Storage Services

The Orion Archive Storage AE accepts CT Image Storage through C-STORE and supports Explicit VR Little Endian.

Supports CT storage and transfer-syntax findings.

OAR-9.4

Orion Archive Integration Guide · Version 7.1 · Published June 28, 2026

Page 52 · Section 9.4 Secure Associations

TLS is optional for DICOM associations. Certificate provisioning, trust configuration, and the approved profile are deployment-specific.

Makes secure transport conditional on project confirmation.

OAR-10.3

Orion Archive Integration Guide · Version 7.1 · Published June 28, 2026

Page 57 · Section 10.3 Query Services

Study Root C-FIND is available to configured viewer Application Entities included in the assigned query scope.

Makes prior query conditional on the viewer AE configuration.

NSV-1.4

Northstar Viewer Integration Reference · Version 3.6 · Published July 2, 2026

Page 6 · Section 1.4 Scope

The reference describes query, retrieval, display, and launch context. Patient-context correction workflows are not described.

Does not establish patient-context correction behavior.

NSV-3.2

Northstar Viewer Integration Reference · Version 3.6 · Published July 2, 2026

Page 18 · Section 3.2 Prior Study Query

The Northstar Viewer Query AE initiates Study Root C-FIND to retrieve matching prior-study records from a configured archive.

Supports the viewer role in the prior-query finding.

Have a defined project decision?

Start with the workflow, systems, versions, and uncertainty.

The first note should be non-sensitive. If the review fits, scope and document-handling boundaries are agreed before evidence is exchanged.

Discuss a review