Frame the decision
We identify the systems, versions, workflow, deadline, and the specific question the review must answer.
How it works
A defined question and a documented result.
We agree on the workflow and decision to review, examine the available documentation, and turn unresolved issues into questions and test cases.
Collect the evidence
You provide the relevant public or approved documents. We confirm the evidence boundary before review begins.
Compare and classify
Claims are cited and classified as supported, unsupported, conditional, conflicting, or unknown.
Turn gaps into tests
Material findings become questions, prerequisites, and acceptance scenarios with observable outcomes.
Read out and hand off
We review the findings, decisions, and next actions, then deliver the working artifacts.
Visible at every stage
You can see the evidence matrix take shape throughout the review.
01Frame
A one-page review brief
02Collect
An approved document and request list
03Compare
A working evidence matrix
04Turn gaps into tests
A gap register and acceptance scenarios
05Read out
A final handoff pack and working session
What we need
Approved documents and context.
- Product names and versions
- Relevant conformance and interface documentation
- Required workflows or use cases
- Known constraints, decisions, and deadlines
What we do not need
PHI or production access.
- Patient images or identifiers
- Credentials, endpoints, or network diagrams
- Access to production clinical systems
- Internal information not approved for review
PHI-free does not mean public. Before document exchange, the review defines what material is authorized, how it will be handled, and when it will be returned or deleted.
Have a project to review?
Tell us what is changing and what the workflow needs to do.
We’ll respond with whether we can help, the likely scope, and what information we would need.
Discuss a review