Change-to-workflow impact map
Service 03
Upgrade & Change Impact Review
Focus regression testing on the workflows and dependencies most likely to have changed.
Decision this supports
Use this before approving a version, replacement, or configuration change whose downstream workflow impact is unclear.
Questions this review answersWhich documented behaviors changed?
Which downstream workflows depend on those behaviors?
What minimum evidence is needed before production change?
When to use it
- PACS, VNA, modality, viewer, or interface-engine upgrades
- Version changes in an integrated AI application
- Routing, reconciliation, or identity-workflow changes
Typical inputs
- Current and target version documentation
- Known integration inventory
- Change notes and architecture context
- Prior issues or acceptance evidence
Before review begins
Scope and timing are agreed first.
The engagement starts only after the project decision, workflow, systems, versions, document boundary, revision process, and handoff are explicit.
- One decision and one bounded workflow
- Named systems and versions
- Approved evidence and handling boundary
- Review window and client dependencies
- Finding-review and revision method
- Final deliverables and working-session handoff
Deliverables
What your team receives.
Targeted regression test plan
New, changed, and unresolved assumptions
Risk-ranked review readout
The review ends with a documented handoff.
Findings include recommended ownership and next actions. Imaging Preflight does not manage vendors, close project actions, certify the integration, or replace testing in the client environment.
Initial inquiry
Start with the project, systems, and decision.
A non-sensitive outline of the workflow, versions, uncertainty, and decision date is enough to begin. Do not attach project documents to the first note.
Discuss a review