Prioritized acceptance scenarios
Service 02
Go-Live Acceptance Plan
Start formal testing with named scenarios, expected results, dependencies, and owners.
Decision this supports
Use this before the project team decides that a new or changed workflow is ready to go live.
Questions this review answersWhat must work on day one?
How will success be observed and recorded?
Which exceptions need a decision before cutover?
When to use it
- A go-live with limited testing time
- A complex image or result-routing workflow
- A project that needs a defensible definition of done
Typical inputs
- Approved workflows and use cases
- Relevant interface documentation
- Environment and test-data constraints
- Existing test scripts, if any
Before review begins
Scope and timing are agreed first.
The engagement starts only after the project decision, workflow, systems, versions, document boundary, revision process, and handoff are explicit.
- One decision and one bounded workflow
- Named systems and versions
- Approved evidence and handling boundary
- Review window and client dependencies
- Finding-review and revision method
- Final deliverables and working-session handoff
Deliverables
What your team receives.
Expected result and evidence for each check
Prerequisite and ownership map
Open-item and exception log structure
The review ends with a documented handoff.
Findings include recommended ownership and next actions. Imaging Preflight does not manage vendors, close project actions, certify the integration, or replace testing in the client environment.
Initial inquiry
Start with the project, systems, and decision.
A non-sensitive outline of the workflow, versions, uncertainty, and decision date is enough to begin. Do not attach project documents to the first note.
Discuss a review